| Editorial
Are
Vermont's Pensions Funding Terror?
By Frank Mazur
The war on terror has evolved
over 25 years. It started when our embassy was attacked in Iran and American
hostages were held for 444 days, and has since been a constant, growing
force bent on destroying our way of life. It is now the most crucial issue
we face as a nation.
This is also a conflict unlike
any other the world has ever seen. As President Bush pointed out, this
war will be fought in many places and in many ways. One important battlefield
is financial.
To wage terrorism costs money.
Al Qaeda (and other groups) must buy weapons, missiles, computers, nuclear
components… All of these things cost money, and the source of that money
comes in great part from the sale crude oil and from the financial markets.
The U.S, therefore, must
is work on becoming more energy independent. This will take time and resources.
But there is something we can do right now -- cease funding companies through
public investment that do business with avowed terrorists.
The Center for Security Policy
released a study in 2004 about "Terrorism Investments of the 50 States".
It revealed that Twenty percent of Vermont's public pension portfolio is
in companies with ties to terrorists sponsoring states. According
to this report the Vermont State Retirement System has invested $235 million
in companies that have business operations in or with countries that sponsor
terrorism. (You can view the report at www.DivestTerror.org.)
This data has been challenged, but the premise still stands.
Vermont Treasurer Jeb Spaulding
proposed to the state pension committee that oversees the investment of
state's pension funds, a policy in early May forbidding any investment
in countries "engaged or complicit in the sponsorship of terrorism…" However,
the policy "does not require an index or commingled investment vehicle"
to be divested, and worse, he has not received much support from the committee
for his proposal.
This ambivalence is outrageous
considering that several States have disallowed investments in "sin" industries
such as tobacco, and Treasurer Spalding himself recently made a point of
investing pension money in Green Mountain Power because of its commitment
to green energy and efficiency programs. Yet, Osama bin Laden gets a disinterested
shrug!
If our state's public dollars
are going to companies whose business operations help underwrite countries
that provide with impunity, technology and safe harbor to those who are
trying to kill us, IT MUST STOP -- if only for the simple reason that companies
doing business with these governments send an unmistakable message that
their support for terrorism is not a concern as long as there are profits
to be made.
The pension committee needs
a reality check: We are in a long term war with terrorists, and Vermonters'
state pension money shouldn't be part of the problem, directly or indirectly.
Vermonters' have plenty of reasons to divest terror; it can help win –
and end -- the war. Is there any reason why the pension board
shouldn't act accordingly?
Frank Mazur is the Advisory
Council Chairman for FreedomWorks-Vermont, and is a former Representative
from South Burlington. For more articles by this author, visit www.FrankMazur.com
Related: www.DivestTerror.org.
# # # # #

|