| Editorial
The
"Road to Serfdom" Becomes a Super Highway
By Robert Maynard
This weekend I received an
e-mail, which underscored a common theme that has been making its way through
the media and has been expressed by many politicians and political activists
who support the so-called health care "reform" bill.
The e-mail in question was
forwarded to me and was from Rev. Debbie Ingram who identified herself
as the Executive Director of Vermont Interfaith Action. In her e-mail,
she informed the intended recipient that:
"Most faith-based
groups support some kind of reform that covers everyone; is affordable
for all Americans, even low-income individuals and families; and is financially
sustainable for our nation. These are the key elements that leaders of
the denominations are looking at when they choose whether to ask their
members to advocate for health care reform."
And that:
"Encouraging
people to do what their conscience tells them is of course a fundamental
principle of the UCC and many denominations. Yet there must also be some
key values that we all share that we can take a stand on: that "we are
our brothers' and sisters' keepers" and that "we love our neighbors as
ourselves" are two of them, intertwined, that lead many people of faith
to say that we must reform our health care system so that all God's children
have access to the quality care they deserve."
The message is clear that all
compassionate people who "love their neighbor" and understand that "we
are our brother’s keeper" naturally support the expansion of government
into the field of health care under the label of "reform". I have already
addressed the notion that for Christians to be considered as supportive
of the Biblical mandate for compassion does not require they embrace the
notion of an expanded role for government in the area of welfare. The following
link is to an October of 2007 article I wrote on the subject entitled "The
Politics of Personal Transformation".
I would like to put this
argument aside for now and take up the mischaracterization of the opponents
of the bill being passed off as health care reform. While assuring the
recipient that he/she was acting in a civil manner, Rev. Ingram goes on
to slander the whole opposition movement:
"While some people, like
yourself, are mostly supportive but asking hard questions that deserve
answers, there is a concerted extremist effort led
by groups called "tea baggers"
who are organized in disrupting town hall meetings across the country,
shouting obscenities at Congress people, and shouting down the comments
of supporters of health care reform. This extremist movement is hopefully
not the majority of people, but they do exist, and it is those people,
not the ones who are asking thoughtful questions, who are behaving in a
way that many UCC clergy and lay people find unacceptable."
What is "unacceptable" is
the slandering of a grass roots movement of concerned citizens who seek
to hold their government accountable. This tactic is being used by the
media, as well and politicians and political activist groups who wish to
silence the voices of those who dissent from the direction we are currently
traveling.
The concern expressed by
the "tea baggers" is not merely over the health care bill, but the sudden
acceleration in a general move toward centralized and expansive government.
In raising this concern, they are echoing the concerns of Nobel Prize winning
economist Friedrich Von Hayek. Hayek expressed this concern in a 1944 book
entitled "The Road to Serfdom". The book points out that the road to serfdom
is paved by centralized planning, which dismantles the free market and
ends up with the destruction of personal and economic liberty. The central
theme of his book is that all forms of collectivism tend toward tyranny.
He used the examples of the Soviet Union and Nazi Germany as nations that
have already traversed the road to serfdom and arrived at tyranny. His
concern was that the welfare state societies of the West were heading down
the same path of political centralization and economic central planning,
but at a slower pace.
As more functions of a healthy
society are assumed by the national government, unelected bureaucracies
are given more power for which they are not held accountable for to the
citizens. Thinkers like Hayek see such a trend as detrimental to a free
and prosperous society.
Instead of slandering the
tea party movement in an attempt to silence them, our political class should
pay more attention to their concerns, which just may turn out to be prophetic.
Robert Maynard is the
Editor of the True North website
# # # # #

|