| . |
Editorial
Defining
Productivity Down
By Martin Harris
Because "School Planning
& Management" is a trade publication widely read throughout the public
education system, you should be able to find the May issue at your nearby
friendly Principal’s office. In it (the magazine, not the office) you’ll
find an article entitled "Classroom Technology Enhances Productivity",
which describes at length the Information Technology investments being
made at the Don Estridge High Tech Middle School in Boca Raton, FL. in
pursuit of that noble goal; it talks about IP telephony and LCD ceiling-mounted
projectors, sound-field saturation systems and biometric systems. You can
get some sense of the focus of the article from this little quote: "one
productivity tool is our locking system. Doors lock and unlock at class
changes for security," says Assistant Principal Michael McCurdy. He continues
with an assertion about "having a world-class faculty with high standards,
and having the expectation and belief that students can meet and even exceed
those standards", but he doesn’t say anything about how the students’ achievements
with respect to those standards are measured, or how educational productivity
(beyond hands-off door-locking) is measured and how standards have been
met or exceeded.
In that respect it reminded
me of an educational meeting I attended back in the early ‘80’s, deep in
the basement of the Middlebury Inn, where the subject was "measuring educational
productivity, performance, and quality standards in the classroom." It
turned out that such quantitative criteria as the number of student seats
in the room, the lineal feet of chalkboard, and the lighting level in foot-candles
at desk level were the standards of productivity, performance, and quality,
and mention of student achievement was distinctly absent.
SP&M writer Ellen Kollie
gets off to a poor start by describing this High Tech Middle School building
as the original "skunk works", confusing the building, which was originally
an IBM computer design facility, with an aerospace research facility in
Burbank California. While the term "skunk works" has slowly come to mean
cutting-edge research of any type anywhere, it originally defined not the
Palm Beach County birthplace of the IBM personal computer in the late ‘70’s,
but rather the Los Angeles County birthplace of the XP-80, a then highly-advanced
jet plane being designed for the Air Force by the Lockheed Aircraft Corporation
starting in 1943. More importantly, her article carefully avoids (as did
Principal McCurdy) the basic question: how do schools define productivity?
For the last quarter century
or more, two answers have been floated. One has been the "school solution"
(forgive the pun) a.k.a. the official definition, such as I saw first hand
back then and still see today in such articles as "Classroom Technology
Enhances Productivity" and isn’t quantified in any measure of cost and
inputs on the school side against achievement and proficiency on the student
side. The other has been a more traditional measure of productivity: what
outputs (student learning) have been accomplished against what inputs in
terms of staff per pupil or cost per pupil or test scores versus spending
levels or even total cost per successful proficient graduate. The school
solution measures lineal feet of chalkboard as a quality standard, while
others --Caroline Hoxby, Harvard education researcher, for example-- measure
units of achievement output against units of cost input, and how these
have changed over time.
Ms. Hoxby’s conclusion is
that "educational productivity fell by approximately 42 percent between
1970-71 and 1998-99" when measured by spending (input) vs NAEP reading
test scores (output). You can read her comments for yourself on the website
of School Reform News, a monthly publication of the Heartland Institute.
Note that such quantitative productivity measures aren’t based on the presence
or absence of electronic door locks, as in Boca Raton, or the presence
or absence of generous amounts of chalkboard, as I heard some Vermont educators
declaim, in the Middlebury Inn basement, many years ago, when test scores
were somewhat higher and annual per pupil costs a whole lot lower
than they are today.
Martin Harris is a former
Chairman of Citizens for Property Rights
# # # # #

|