| . |
Editorial
Enforced
Purity?
By Bruce P. Shields
Ann Coulter in January of
2007 published an article in which she stated that the Nazis were vegetarians.
As one might expect with invective aimed at other targets, her point is
partially accurate. The connection of Nazi propaganda -- talking
points, books, pamphlets, opinion pieces, and party platforms -- to vegetarian
ideals is very complicated yet real.
The Nazi enterprise began
as a loose coalition of various grassroots organizations right after World
War I. France during the 18th and early 19th century was the most
aggressively imperialist power in continental Europe, capturing most of
North Africa and extensive tracts in the rest of the world. France
also (following the doctrine laid out by Napolean for "squaring the boundary")
captured and forcibly Frank-ised several places in Europe in which the
majority population spoke a Germanic language. Germany until the
mid-19th Century was never a single nation. It was a wide-ranging
group of independent principalities speaking more than a dozen similar
languages ranging from Dutch and Flemish in the West to Hoch Deutsch [High
German -- i.e. the Alpine version of German] in the East. An ideal of many
German nationalists from the 18th Century on was to unite all the German
speakers in Europe into one nation, just as Italian speakers united to
form Italy, Spanish speakers to form Spain, and so on. The Austrian
Emperor to many German nationalists represented the highest ideal of German-ness.
Following World War I, despite
Woodrow Wilson's ineffectual protest, the French were successful in humiliating
the Germans politically -- they forced the end to the Austrian empire,
and installed the Weimar Republic, which became a symbol of democracy imposed
by force to many German nationalists. And France also successfully
destroyed the German economy, which had been the third largest in the world
prior to the war. And so the coalition of anti-Weimar political cells
which later became the Nationalistic Socialist party [abbreviated
Na-zi according to the common German way of creating acronyms] embraced
many groups with somewhat disparate goals. During the 1920's, the
Nazis struggled under Joseph Goebbels to develop a set of themes which
would stir the widest acceptance, would motivate the core constituencies
most deeply, and would engage the aspirations of most people who were not
firmly committed Nazis.
The broadest group of early
Nazis came from the Blut und Boden (Blood and Soil) movement, a
rural party analogous to America's Grange movement which agitated for German
language, German customs, and local community control of farms and markets.
This movement had a great deal in common with the later developing Ecology
movement: for instance, it stressed recycling in the extreme, arguing that
nutrients carried in produce to towns should be returned to the earth from
which it came. Milwaukee, Wisconsin, was settled by many Germans
who cherished their connections to the homeland. You may know that
Milwaukee in the 1940's marketed a fertilizer called Milorganite processed
from the solids from the City of Milwaukee sewage treatment plant.
The slogan in Germany for this ideal translates as "Each turd returns home."
As an agrarian movement,
the Blut und Boden people were also very suspicious of city people, and
were especially aggrieved by the intrusion of capitalist modes of organization
into the traditionally communitarian institutions of the ancient rural
economy. In many rural areas, a kind of code word for capitalism
was Jewish, in some small part inflamed by the very spectacular success
of the French Jewish family of Rothschild in investment banking.
So the core Nazi group coalesced around the idea of purity: racial purity,
purity of language, purity of communitarian customs. With its agrarian
base, the Nazi propaganda (excluding the extreme racism normally present)
would read today like the program of the Green Party.
The Nazi party never officially
embraced vegetarianism. However, given the background of the core
activists, it is not surprising that several leading Nazis were vegetarian.
Dame Anna Bramwell of Oxford University [A History of Ecology in the
20th Century] notes that both Hitler and Himmler were vegetarian --
not aggressively so, but consistently. Himmler moved during World
War II into a very rigidly Vegan position, prompting one recent biographer
to speculate that he harbored a repressed guilt for the death of so many
Jews. Curiously, both Himmler and Hitler also sponsored many animal
rights measures which were imposed by the 3d Reich, such as a ban on veal.
Many Nazi leaders were influenced by the doctrines of homeopathy as developed
by the communitarian Rudolph Steiner, whose thought also influenced a number
of organizations still active in the US. Hermann Goering embraced
several of these ideas simultaneously: he purged a huge area of several
hundred square miles on the Polish border of the alien Polish residents
and replaced them with a small number of pure German villages sprinkled
among a vast natural wildlife area to which he restored several threatened
and endangered species -- which he would hunt annually.
None of this should suggest
that one may call modern American ecological politics Nazi. It is
useful, however, to understand how evil a movement could be which paraded
many ecological values at the front of its agenda. The unique damage
of the Nazis came from blending notions of ecological purity with standards
of cultural, economic and racial purity, and focusing the whole power of
the State to enforce these standards of purity.
Bruce Shields has retired
from three professions; college English teacher, sawmiller and executive
of the Vermont Forest Products Association, and operator of a farm supply
store. In retirement, he works his woodlot and maple sugar place,
sits on the boards of several statewide organizations related to natural
resources, and serves as Lister in the town of Eden, VT.
# # # # #

|