| Editorial
Simple
AGW Editorial Goes Global in 48 Hours
By James A. Peden
Never underestimate the power
of the internet. Here's a truly amazing story:
I, too became suspicious
of the Global Warming Hype several months ago, and having a background
in Atmospheric Physics (long retired), I undertook a personal study spanning
many weeks of primarily Internet research - including much valuable data
and analysis from contributors to ICECAP. (many thanks)
As the editor of a regional
community internet network (www.middlebury.net), I summarized my findings
in an editorial specifically designed to be read and hopefully understood
by the non-rocket-scientist, including, when necessary, short breaks of
teaching some elementary physics as I went along so regular folks could
follow the story without choking on 2nd order partial differential equations.
I next placed an isolated
page on the server for examination (peer review) by a select circle of
colleagues to whom I sent the URL.
Somehow it was leaked prematurely.
The web logs showed it started immediately spreading virally, virtually
all over the globe. The following morning, I received an email from
the U.S. Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works, indicating my
still-under-review essay had been excerpted and distributed further.
The popularity of the article
seems to be that it was written for the average layman, who presumably
has been eagerly awaiting a layman-level explanation. Links to it
quickly spread to more than a dozen other web sites, and the page has been
viewed from 24 foreign countries at last check.
There's a philosophical principle
called Occam's Razor, which essentially says one should not increase, beyond
what is necessary, the number of entities required to explain anything.
While the whole world argues over melting ice caps, drowning polar bears,
droughts and floods and other complex catastrophes, I simply asked myself,
"What is the maximum amount of the earth's agreed-upon Black Body radiation
that the atmosphere's agreed-upon amount of CO2 is capable of absorbing?
My very simple calculations,
using generally acceptable CO2 absorption and Black Body radiation spectra,
yielded a result that seemed to indicate that CO2 wasn't much of a player
in the so-called Greenhouse Effect. So, you can argue all day about
polar bears and such, but in the end, whatever you decide has to obey the
fundamental laws of physics.
Yes, the planet may be warming,
or cooling, or whatever... but man isn't to blame and man can't stop what
Mother Earth (and the Sun) are planning for the future.
It's really as simple as
that. And it looks like most regular folks prefer a simple explanation,
particularly if it is wholly in agreement with what we think of as the
fundamental laws of physics. That's probably why the essay spread around
the globe so fast... regular folks could understand it.
The sad part is, the Global
Warming Fanatics will undoubtedly continue their desperate fight to force
us all to fall into lockstep with their radical, paranoid environmental
agendas. Even sadder is the recent study that 95% of the younger
children now fear for the future of their lives, and the planet.
None dare call it terrorism...
... but when you frighten
our children unnecessarily, that's exactly what you are - environmental
terrorists. Shame, shame, shame....
I began my personal study
with absolutely no personal environmental or political agenda. I
simply wanted to dig out the truth and perhaps share it with a few others
in our regional network.
But I thank you ICECAP folks
for this wonderful forum which helped lead me to a trove of good, honest
data and analysis, and indirectly helped spread my very simple paper all
over the globe. Many thanks to the "real" environmental scientists
out there, struggling against almost overwhelming political odds.
Oh, and as one quoting web
site said, "Brew up a pot of coffee or two and start reading here..."
http://www.middlebury.net/op-ed/global-warming-01.html
James A. Peden, Editor
The Middlebury, Vermont
Community Network
www.middlebury.net
# # # # #

|