| Editorial
America
We Have a Problem
By Robert Maynard
As we look back on 2009 it
is not surprising that we ended the year contemplating a failed terrorist
attempt. I am, of course, referring to the attempted Christmas Day Flight
253 bombing. It comes as no surprise that we should close out the year
2009 thinking about an attempted terrorist attack because the year has
seen a sharp increase in such attacks. That is the conclusion reached in
a December 23rd 2009 Time Magazine article by Bobby
Ghosh entitled: "Domestic-Terrorism Incidents Hit a Peak in 2009".
Mr. Gosh notes that:
"...by the calculations of
Rand Corp. expert Brian Jenkins, more terrorist threats were uncovered
in the U.S. in 2009 than in any year since 2001.
"'There appears to be an
increase in [terrorist] activity in the U.S.,' warns Jenkins, who calculates
that there have been 32 terrorism-related events on these shores since
9/11 and that 12 of them occurred in 2009."
In short, almost 38% of the
terrorist attacks that have occurred on our shores since 9/11 took place
in 2009. To paraphrase our former astronauts: "America We Have a Problem".
Instead of facing the problem, some in Congress are desperately trying
to defect attention away from Secretary of Homeland Security Janet Napolitano’s
"the system worked" comments" by arguing that the problem is that we are
not spending enough money.
In an article entitled "Morning
Bell: Terrorism Threat Demands Smarter Security, Not More Money", The Heritage
Foundation’s Conn Carroll argues that the system has failed and a smarter
security system, not more money is the answer. The key is to disrupt terrorist
attacks as early as possible. Among the lessons that we need to learn in
order to have a smarter system are:
#1: U.S. Security
needs to master stopping the threat of individuals carrying bombs on their
persons.
#2: Get smarter about stopping
"the people carrying bomb" threat. (In other words, focus on the potential
terrorist rather than the bomb. Needless to say that the ability to profile
suspicious types would go a long way)
#3: Dots were not connected.
(Our inability to connect the dots stems from our unwillingness to accept
the fact that there is a global Jihadi network behind most terrorist attacks.
In a Family Security Matters article entitled "Rash of 2009 Homegrown Terror
Plots Ends ‘Denial’", Steve Emerson of the Investigative Project on Terrorism
interviewed terrorist expert Dr. Walid Pahares about the role of "political
correctness" in preventing a vigorous investigation of Hasan prior to the
Fort Hood massacre. According to Dr. Phares ‘The federal bureaucracy contains
a "body of expertise" that advises the government not to identify and counter
radical Islamism when it finds it.’)
# 4: The System Failed. Abdulmutallab
did not dream up his attack on his own. (According to an ABC December 28
article entitled "Al Qaeda Leader Behind Northwest Flight 253 Terror Plot
Was Released by U.S.", at least two of the plotters were released by the
U.S. from "GITMO". It just might be a good idea not to keep releasing terrorists
into a revolving door where they come back to try their luck again.)
There are many problems with
our current security system, but they all seem to stem from an unwillingness
to accept the fact that we are engaged in a war with an enemy that is determined
to destroy us. The failure to "connect the dots" leading to 9/11 was partly
a result of treating a series of related ideologically driven terror attacks
as isolated incidents of domestic crime. It seems that we are slow in learning
this lesson.
Robert Maynard is the
Editor of the True North website
# # # # #

|